Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:14

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Oilers-Panthers tale of the tape: Who has the edge in Cup Final rematch? - theScore.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do people love to live alone in a house?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are some K-pop idols with smiles that are healing?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What was your most memorable experience catching a fraudulent car seller?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Google Meet’s Material 3 Expressive redesign has ludicrously capacious buttons - 9to5Google
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Gold Holds Decline After US Jobs Data Deters Demand for Havens - Bloomberg
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.